| |
|
1. Why
do we need an Army National Training Center?
2. Why
not use simulation for these requirements?
3. Will
the Army or NTC fail if the expansion doesn't
go through?
4. Do
the manuevers threaten the Desert Tortoise
population?
5. How
will this expansion affect the surrounding
Mojave Desert?
6. Who
owns the extra 110,000acres of land that are
not presently part of the NTC?
7. According
to the LURS study--there is a shortfall of
60,000 acres, so what kind of training will
the NTC be able to conduct?
8. Why
doesn't the Army just clear Leach Lake and
use it for maneuvers?
9. Can't
the Air Force use bombing ranges at Nellis
AFB, instead of Leach Lake?
10. Couldn't
the Army use other military lands, like NAWS
China Lake for training?
11.
What criteria are used to determine the proposed
expansion area?
|
| |
|
1.
Why do we need an Army National Training Center? |
| |
|
The
mission of the U.S. military is to preserve
and protect the American way of life. The key
to adequate defense is readiness and the key
to readiness is realistic training. To survive
and win future conflicts and wars, the Army
must have experienced soldiers and leaders.
Actual war is not the place to learn from mistakes.
The NTC is the only place in the United States
where our soldiers have the space and topography
for realistic battlefield training of brigade
sized units. Sophisticated military equipment
and advanced technology require a comprehensive
battlefield that realistically simulates the
tempo, range, and intensity of current and,
most importantly, future conflicts. The NTC
must provide all the necessary components to
achieve world-class training for the world's
best Army.For more detailed information, see
the NTC
Land Expansion Article.
|
| |
|
2.
Why not use simulation for these requirements? |
| |
|
Simulation
can take training only so far; it can only
stress a system to a certain point. Simulation
cannot take the rigors and unexpected events
of the battlefield fully into account. Live,
realistic training is the only way to fulfill
the Army's training mission of "train
as you fight."
|
| |
|
3.
Will the Army or NTC fail if the expansion
doesn't go through? |
| |
|
The
Army is not going to fail. But we are very
concerned about about the cost of lives vs.
training. The more realistic the training,
the less loss of life in war.
|
| |
|
4.
Do the maneuvers threaten the Desert Tortoise Population? |
| |
|
Operations
at the NTC have not had significant impacts
on the Desert Tortoise population. On average
3-5 Tortoises are accidentally killed per year
(allowed 15 under the Biological Opinion).
This low rate is due to the cautionary measures
the Army takes to protect the Desert Tortoise.
The relatively low-density of tortoises on
NTC and their ability to move into areas not
used for maneuvers (above 20 percent slope)
also contributes to the low death rate.
Due to the on-going
stewardship efforts made by the Army, the Desert
Tortoise is able to co-exist with NTC training.
The NTC won the prestigious Hammer Award for
outstanding stewardship of the environment
in 1996. This award, given by Vice President
Al Gore through the Secretary of Interior,
cited the NTC's ongoing efforts to manage its
lands in a responsible and effective manner.
|
| |
|
5.
How will this expansion affect the surrounding Mojave
Desert? |
| |
|
The
Mojave Desert encompasses 34.5 million acres
of land in California, Arizona, and Nevada.
The military currently uses less than 10 percent
(approximately 3 million acres) of the total
Mojave Desert. The proposed expansion alternative
adds an additional 141,888 acres to the available
maneuver training area. This expansion plan
presents minimal impact on the environment
and local residences.
|
| |
|
6.
Who owns the extra 110,000 acres of land that are
not presently part of the NTC? |
| |
|
The
expansion concept calls for the withdrawal
and reservation of two parcels of land, one
to the west of Fort Irwin and one to the east
of Fort Irwin. This land has been withdrawn
by Congress and is currently managed by the
Army under the Interim Management Plan (IMP).
|
| |
|
7.
According to the LURS study--there is still a shortfall
of 60,000 acres, so what kind of training will the
NTC be able to conduct? |
|
|
|
| |
|
The
LURS is still valid; however, DA and DOI needed
to balance the needs for an expansion and the
needs of federally protected species. From
a doctrinal perspective, the length of the
new maneuver corridor is nearly correct for
brigade operations.
|
| |
|
8.
Why doesn't the Army just clear Leach Lake and use
it for maneuvers? |
| |
|
The
Leach Lake Impact Area comprises approximately
92,000 acres within the current Fort Irwin
boundaries. It has been used since 1981 for
live-fire exercises by the Army and as a live
ordnance bombing range for the Air Force. The
NTC considered the use of Leach Lake to help
meet its additional training land needs; however,
the following factors make the use of the area
infeasible:
Training
Value: Leach Lake is an essential component
of the Air Force’s Air Warrior Program.
Air Warrior trains aircrews the same way the
NTC trains mechanized and support units. During
a scenario, the NTC incorporates all the various
facets required to realistically reproduce
actual battle conditions. Such realism includes
incorporation of Air Force sorties in support
of training units (BLUFOR) and the opposing
forces (OPFOR) to simulate air cover and attack.
Air Warrior allows both Army and Air Force
units to train together in the same way they
would fight together in actual combat. Leach
Lake is also separated from the base by mountain
ranges and would not provide a wide enough
corridor.
Training
Compatibility: If Leach Lake were not
available for Air Warrior pilots to drop live
ordnance, they would be forced to use bombing
ranges at the Nevada Test and Training Range
(NTTR) north of Nellis AFB. Using valuable
training time to access the NTTR would greatly
reduce the time available to fly to Fort Irwin
for Air Warrior combat support missions. Leach
Lake is also used as an emergency jettison
range for live ordnance to ensure aircrew safety
during Air Warrior exercises.
Cost:
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers estimated
the cost of clearing unexploded ordnance from
this site at approximately $200 million. In
addition to the high cost of clearing the area,
the Air Force would have to abandon their use
of Leach Lake, which would compromise their
combat training and mission readiness.
|
| |
|
9.
Can't the Air Force use bombing ranges at Nellis
AFB, instead of Leach Lake? |
| |
|
The
Air Force does use bombing ranges at Nellis
AFB; however, an aircraft can only stay airborne
for a limited time. Using a large portion of
that time to access Nellis ranges greatly limits
the time available to fly to NTC for Air Warrior
combat missions. In addition, the Nellis range
is too small to allow the kind of training
exercises possible at Leach Lake. Finally,
Leach Lake is also used as an emergency jettison
range for live ordnance to ensure aircrew safety
during Air Warrior exercises.
|
| |
|
10.
Couldn't the Army use other military lands, like
NAWS China Lake, for training? |
| |
|
In
1993, representatives from Fort Irwin approached
China Lake managers to explore joint use of
training lands. At the Army’s request,
the Navy commissioned a Mission Compatibility
Study of the National Training Center’s
Proposal for NTC Armored Maneuver Training
at NAWCWPNS (NAWC 1993) to determine the compatibility
of the NTC and China Lake NAWC missions. The
study included: rotational schedules, radio
frequency interference from jamming, airspace
interference between rotations and on going
missions, and geographic obstacles that limit
access between the two installations. The study
concluded that shared use was not feasible.
|
| |
|
11.
What criteria are used to determine the proposed
expansion area? |
| |
|
A
number of factors are taken into consideration,
such as:
1.
Training value: Training value is the
measure of how useful a particular tract of
land is to the mission of the NTC. The Army
has long recognized that additional land area
is needed to support better maneuver capabilities
and to increase the diversity of mission scenarios.
The amount of land is not necessarily the most
critical factor in considering the training
value of the land being evaluated. Instead,
it is the usefulness of a particular tract
of land to meet training requirements.
2.
Impacts on the Environment and the Surrounding
Communities: The NTC takes into consideration
the impacts the expansion would have on the
environment, to include the Desert Tortoise
and the Lane Mountain Milkvetch, along with
impacts that may affect the surrounding businesses
and communities.
3.
Long-term Use and Manageability: The
NTC wants to ensure successful management and
long-term viability of the Desert Tortoise
population, as well as other species on the
NTC. In addition, they want to make certain
they meet the guidance and standards put forth
by the
West Mojave Plan which is intended to serve
as a Habitat Conservation Plan for the western
Mojave area.
4.
Mitigation Measures: The NTC takes into
consideration the most feasible approach when
it comes to offsetting impacts associated with
the expansion. Mitigation measures include:
avoiding, minimizing, rectifying, reducing,
or compensating. In general, the optimal mitigation
measure is one that meets the Army's training
objectives while concurrently meeting the Army's
environmental stewardship responsibilities.
|